The claim comes after Minister Reilly admitted that he met NAMA on April 20th of this year and discussed the issue of locating a primary care centre in Balbriggan.
Deputy Doherty said: "Minister James Reilly has repeatedly stated that he had nothing to do with the choice of the site for the Balbriggan primary care centre. During an Oireachtas debate in September he said, 'I had no hand, act nor part in this'.
"It is now clear that this is not the case. Minister Reilly has been involved in discussions with his Department Officials and NAMA on the Balbriggan site in April of this year. It is also clear that his party colleague, developer Seamus Murphy could stand to benefit from the choice of the Balbriggan site.
-- Advertisement --
"Earlier this month I asked Minister for Finance Michael Noonan whether there had been contact between Minister for Health James Reilly and NAMA on the location of a primary care centre at the Balbriggan site owned by Reilly's associate Seamus Murphy.
"The Minister refused to answer the question stating that this information was confidential.
"This week I put the same question to Minister Reilly himself. In response he admitted that he had indeed met with NAMA on April 20th of this year to discuss 'a number of primary care locations…including Balbriggan'.
"I also pressed Minister Reilly to detail the nature of these discussions but he refused to answer the question. Both Ministers clearly have questions to answer.
"Why did Minister Noonan refuse to provide information that Minister Reilly met with NAMA when asked? Why did Minister Reilly not divulge this information before now? What were the details of the discussions between Minister Reilly and NAMA – discussions that took place months before Minister Reilly included the Balbriggan site on the priority list of primary care centres. What have these two senior government Ministers got to hide?
"It is time for Minister Reilly and Minister Noonan to come clean on this issue. Clearly James Reilly has played a central part in the selection of the Balbriggan site. His close associate Seamus Murphy could benefit financially from the Minister’s involvement in the decision. Why did Minister Reilly not come forward with this information before? What other information has he not yet revealed."
(CD)
